Faculty Directory
Contact Information Biographical Information Research Interests Publications Group Information Current Classes
 


Electronic Structure of Material Grain Boundaries and Interfaces

A. Stability of Silver Ultra-Thin Films on GaAs (110)

(a) Motivation
  • Ag/GaAs (110)
    • Normally non-wetting
  • Two-step deposition:
    1. Deposit Ag on to chilled substrate ~100K. (Ag Nanoclusters form)
    2. Slowly anneal to RT (300 K)
  • Film morphology dependent on amount of Ag deposited:
    • Ag Thickness < 15 Å → Islands
    • Ag Thickness = 15 Å → Flat film
    • Ag Thickness > 15 Å → Rough film
  • Ag has different preferential thickness on different substrates
    • Ag/GaP (110) ~ 17 Å
    • Ag/GaAs (110) ~ 15 Å
    • Ag/GaSb (110) ~ 6 Å
  • Why is this interesting?
    • Practical → Device contacts
    • Scientific → Self assembly
    • Uses → Method used to grow buffer layers for Fe on GaAs
(b) Methodology
  • One model that attempts to explain the preferential stability of some metal films is the Electronic Growth Model (EGM).
  • Density functional theory (DFT) within the CASTEP program:
    • GGA-PW91
    • ultrasoft pseudopotentials
    • K.E. cutoff 340 eV
    • k-point spacing:
    • 0.10 Å-1 (initial)
      0.05 Å-1 (to evaluate E)
  • Tolerances:
    • DE = 5x10-6 eV/atom
    • DFRMS = 0.100 eV/Å
    • DDRMS = 0.001 Å
      Convergence of the total energy for GaAs as a function of kinetic energy cutoff. FFT grid is 36×36×36 and lattice parameters are fixed at experimental values of 5.635 Å.

(c) Results
i) Optimizing the Unit Cell
  • The 1×5 near coincident size lattice (NCSL) unit cell is strain free, but is too large to handle computationally.
  • An approximate unit cell is needed to calculate properties of multilayer systems.
  • Calculated adhesion energies of approximate unit cells are dependent on lateral interactions.
  • The 1×2 NCSL provides the best combination of accuracy and affordability.

(d) Conclusions
  • In the EGM simple calculations are performed to determine the stability of the metallic overlayer.
  • First principles calculations on Ag/GaAs show the importance of accounting for the resulting structural changes caused by
    • the presence of the interface
    • the overlayers response to the surrounding electronic structure
  • Both quantities act to strain the overlayer from ideal positions.
  • These structural changes are not accounted for in simple electron gas models of metals.

B. Doped and Pristine Cubic-ZrO2 Tilt Grain Boundaries

(a) Motivation
  • Impurity and point defect segregation to ionic grain boundaries and surfaces is known to influence the physical properties of ceramic materials.
  • Characterization of these defects is essential to tailor metal oxides for technological applications.
  • Ab initio calculations can help us better understand the driving forces that lead to point defect segregation in metal oxides.
(b) Computational Details
  • Density functional theory
  • Local density approximation (LDA)
  • Nonlocal, norm-conserving pseudopotentials and plane wave expansions with kinetic energy cutoffs of 600 eV
Lattice Parameter (Å)LDA-600 eV cutoffLDA-800 eV cutoffLDA-1000 eV cutoffGGA-600 eV cutoffExpt. data
Lattice constant5.155.155.165.165.09
Zr-O length2.232.232.242.242.21
Zr-Zr length3.643.643.653.653.60
Energy/ZrO2 (eV)956.39959.52961.13961.07 

(c) Calculations
i) Grain Boundary Energies
ModelNumber of atomsGrain boundary energy
(eV/Å2)
Grain boundary energy
(relaxed) (eV/Å2)
11440.4738±0.0014 
21320.2199±0.0013 
31320.3791±0.00130.0449±0.0013
41320.3894±0.0013 
51320.2302±0.0013?0.0449±0.0013

ii) Segregation of Y to Relaxed ZrO2 Σ5(310)/[001] Tilt Grain Boundary
Esegregation = (EYGB - EY0) - (EGB - E0)
Substitution SiteSegregation Energy
(eV/atom)
Site A-9.87
Site B-13.78
Site C-4.30
Site D-9.28
Site E-0.08
(d) Conclusions
  • The O-terminated Ni(111)/ZrO2(100) interface is more stable then the Zr-terminated interface according to our preliminary first principles calculations. We are working to complete these preliminary calculations and consider the effect of Y3+ doping on the results.
  • Five pristine ZrO2 grain boundary model structures are examined and the most energetically favorable models are determined.
  • Lowest energy models relax to the same structure that agrees well with experimental Z-contrast image data.
  • Segregation energies at the grain boundaries after Y3+ doping are also determined and a preferred doping site with the lowest segregation energy is identified.


Please send your comments, suggestions, or corrections to webmaster@www.mse.ufl.edu
Last Update: Wednesday, April 27, 2005



Copyright © 2005     Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida