Faculty Directory
Contact Information Biographical Information Research Interests Publications Group Information Current Classes
 


The Chemical Products of Ionic, Molecular, and Cluster Beam Deposition

Motivations
  • Better understanding of the chemical processes that occur during molecular cluster-surface collisions
  • Predictions about growth of strongly adhering thin films
  • Improved understanding of how thin-film nucleation and growth from beam deposition is affected by reactions conditions such as impact velocity and beam configuration (as molecules or molecular clusters).
  • Improved understanding of effect of reaction conditions on thin-film nucleation and growth
  • Determine mechanisms involved in film growth via cluster beam deposition
(a) Modification of Polystyrene Substrate: Hydrocarbon vs. Hydrocarbon Ions
i) C3H5+ at 50 eV vs. CH3+ at 20 eV
  • C3H5+ dissociates into fragments that are embedded within the polystyrene matrix 65% of the time.
  • CH3+ scatters from the surface 20 % of the time (sometimes taking a surface H atom with it). The rest of the time it embeds within the surface without dissociating.
  • Despite the fact that the energy/atom is nearly the same in the last two cases the processes that occur on impact are very different and depend heavily on the composition and unique chemistry of the incident ion.
ii) C3H5+ vs. CH3+ at same energies
  • At the same incident energy of 20 eV CH3+ and C3H5+ show similar distributions of scattering and penetration into the surface
  • At the same incident energy of 50 eV both ions dissociate most of the time. However, C3H5+ dissociates into a much wider variety of species than CH3+
iii) C3H5+ Isomeric Ions at 50 eV
  • Differences in dissociation products that grow the thin film as a result of changes in the structure of the incident ion:
    • when the incident structure contains CH3 pieces, CH3 are predicted make up 11-13 % of the products; otherwise, CH3 makes up only ~ 1 % of the products
    • CH3-CH=CH+ is easiest to dissociate while the CH2-CH+-CH2 is the most difficult to dissociate
iv) Energy Transfers
  • Scattering from the surface
    • CH3+: 84% incident energy transferred to polystyrene, 11% remains ion kinetic energy, 5% transformed into ion internal energy
    • C3H5+: 95% incident energy transferred to surface, 2% remains ion kinetic energy, 3% transformed to ion internal energy
  • Embedding in the surface
    • CH3+ and C3H5+: 97-98% incident energy transferred to the polystyrene and 2-3% transformed to ion internal energy

(b) Modification of Polystyrene Substrate: Hydrocarbon vs. Fluorocarbon Ions
1) System Setup
      The system contains about 9000 atoms with 52 Å × 30 Å × 56 Å in dimension. In order to control the temperature, thermal state atoms is set around the interested deposition region. During the deposition the system is controlled at 300 K. Four kinds of ions are used in the deposition, C3H5+, CH3+ and C3F5+, CF3+. The fluence is comparable to the experimental conditions. The deposition energy is 50 eV/ion.

2) The depth profile of incident ions
      Different incident ions and conditions produce different depth profiles. Ions that easily react with the substrate will not penetrate the substrate to as great an extent. In addition, ions with smaller incident velocities and larger sizees will similarly penetrate only a short distance insto the substrate. Thus, C3H5+ ions tend to aggregate together and mostly stay near the surface. In contrast, CH3+ ions penetrate more deeply.

3) Density of species
      Hydrocarbon ions are more reactive then fluorocarbon ions, since most of these ions and their fragments bond with the polystyrene substrate. For C3H5+ ions, the majority species is CnHm, where n > 3 and m > 5. This tells us that C3H5+ ions tend to aggregate together.

4) Percentage of intact polystyrene chains
     The ions can be ranked as follows from those that produce the larged modification of the surface to the least amount of modification: CH3+, CF3+,C3F5+ and C3H5+.
Depth (Å) C3F5+ CF3+ C3H5+ CH3+
0 - 7 0 25 0 0
7 - 14 25 25 25 0
14 - 21 75 25 100 25
21 - 28 100 100 100 0
28 -35 100 100 100 100
5) Percentage of intact phenyl rings
     CH3+ ions modify the phenyl rings to the greated extent.
Depth (Å) C3F5+ CF3+ C3H5+ CH3+
0 - 7 22.7 27.3 9 4.5
7 - 14 86.4 36.4 40.9 4.5
14 - 21 100 60 90 20
21 - 28 100 100 100 31.8
28 -35 100 100 100 50
(c) Modification of Diamond (111) Substrate by Organic Molecular Cluster Deposition
Growth of thin films under beam impact
  • When system energy is less than 3 eV/molecule of molecular bond energy thin film nucleation and growth occurs.
  • Effect of cluster size, incident velocity and surface reactivity on film nucleation explored.
  • Processes predicted to occur during experimental film growth include surface cratering, adhesion of chemical products to surface, partial sputtering of film, and continued growth.
Beam Impacts
  • The simulations provide details of how changes in reaction conditions influence thin film growth.
  • Mechanisms of cluster-beam deposition include polymerization, adhesion, surface penetration and sputtering.
  • Heavier clusters cause more surface damage.
Cluster vs. Molecular Beam
  • Effect of cluster size, molecular reactivity, surface temperature and surface reactivity on thin-film nucleation through molecular cluster deposition explored. Mechanisms of cluster-beam deposition include polymerization, adhesion, surface penetration and sputtering.
  • No significant differences predicted for molecular beam and molecular cluster beam deposition.

We provide open source codes for MD simulations: C-H REBO MD code, C-F-H REBO MD code, and C-O-H REBO MD code.



Please send your comments, suggestions, or corrections to webmaster@www.mse.ufl.edu
Last Update: Wednesday, April 27, 2005



Copyright © 2005     Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida